Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/81633
Type of publication: Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science ar/ir Scopus / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or / and Scopus (S1)
Field of Science: Ekologija ir aplinkotyra / Ecology and environmental sciences (N012)
Author(s): Borggaard, O.K;Hansen, H.C.B;Holm, P.E;Jensen, J.K;Rasmussen, S.B;Sabienė, Nomeda;Steponkaitė, Laura
Title: Experimental Assessment of Using Soluble Humic Substances for Remediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Soils
Is part of: Soil & sediment contamination. , 2009, Vol. 18, Iss. 3
Extent: p. 369-382
Date: 2009
Keywords: Cadmium;Copper;DOC;EDTA;Lead;Nickel;Sequential extraction;Soil washing
Abstract: Since heavy metals are nondegradable and strongly bonded in soils, remediation of heavy metal polluted soils by extraction is difficult and current extraction techniques require harsh chemicals such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). However, use of EDTA is environmentally problematic because of costs, persistence, toxicity and deterioration of soil structure. Therefore, the potential of soluble natural humic substances (HS) to extract heavy metals from contaminated soils is tested as an environmentally friendly substitute for EDTA. A strongly polluted, calcareous urban soil (CRC soil) and a moderately polluted agricultural soil (CUP soil) were extracted at neutral pH in batch mode by three HS solutions from beech and Norway spruce litter (Beech-HS and Spruce-HS) and processed cow slurry (Bio-HS), all containing 25 mM dissolved organic carbon (DOC). After 10 extractions with a solution to soil ratio of 5:1 (L/kg), 8% to 39% of the total Cd, Cu, Ni and Pb soil contents, lowest for Ni and highest for Cu/Pb, were extracted. Natural and processed HS samples had comparable capacities to extract the heavy metals. A comparison of 100 mM DOC of Bio-HS and EDTA as extractants for Cu from the CRC soil showed extraction of 67% by EDTA and 41% by Bio-HS, indicating somewhat higher efficiency of EDTA than of HS. Sequential extraction of the CRC soil after Bio-HS and EDTA extraction showed removal of exchangeable, carbonate- and metal oxide-bound Cu but also of some residual Cu. It is therefore concluded that HS appears to be an attractive and promising alternative to EDTA as remediation agent for heavy metal polluted soils provided cheap HS of good quality is easily available
Internet: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/81633
Affiliation(s): Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Žemės ūkio akademija
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml7.61 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Mar 5, 2020

Download(s)

8
checked on Mar 5, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.