Release and retention patterns of organic compounds and nutrients after the cold period in foliar litterfall of pure European larch, common beech and red oak plantations in Lithuania
Author | Affiliation | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Čiuldienė, Dovilė | ||||
Date |
---|
2017 |
This study was carried out in alien warmth-tolerant forest plantations of red oak (Quercus rubra), common beech (Fagus sylvatica) and European larch (Larix decidua). We compared the changes in foliar litterfall mass and biochemical composition after five months of cold period. The mean mass of fresh foliar litterfall collected in late autumn was 30% higher in red oak compared to the larch and beech plantations. After the cold period, the reduction of foliar litterfall mass did not exceed 10% in any of the studied plantations. The fresh foliar litterfall of red oak was the richest in cellular fibre and easily decomposable glucose and nutrients such as P and Mg, larch was distinguished by the highest lignin, N, K and Ca concentrations, while beech fresh foliar litterfall was the poorest in the aforementioned nutrients. After the cold period, the changes in the biochemical composition of foliar litterfall revealed different patterns. In the spring, the beech and red oak foliar litterfall was the richest in N, P and Ca, meanwhile the larch foliar litterfall still had the highest concentration of lignin but, in contrast to the autumn, was the poorest in nutrients. After the cold period Lignin: N, C : N and C : P ratios reached critical values indicating that the foliar litterfall of beech and red oak had started to decompose. The highest lignin concentration and the highest and most stable Lignin: N, C : N, C : P and N : P ratios after the cold period indicated that the slowest foliar litterfall decomposition took place in the larch plantation.
Klaidos ištaisymo nuoroda https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134%2FS1064229317060138
Journal | IF | AIF | AIF (min) | AIF (max) | Cat | AV | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE | 0.667 | 2.697 | 2.697 | 2.697 | 1 | 0.247 | 2017 | Q4 |
Journal | IF | AIF | AIF (min) | AIF (max) | Cat | AV | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE | 0.667 | 2.697 | 2.697 | 2.697 | 1 | 0.247 | 2017 | Q4 |
Journal | Cite Score | SNIP | SJR | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eurasian Soil Science | 1.2 | 0.932 | 0.398 | 2017 | Q3 |