Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/51327
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Teisė / Law (S001)
Author(s): Tikniūtė, Agnė
Title: Juridinio asmens doktrina : šiuolaikinės tendencijos
Other Title: The doctrine of legal entity: contemporary tendencies
Is part of: Jurisprudencija : mokslo darbai. Vilnius : Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2008, Nr. 2 (104)
Extent: p. 64-72
Date: 2008
Keywords: Juridinio asmens teorija;Kreditorių apsauga;Socialinė juridinio asmens atsakomybė;Theory of legal entity;Creditor protection;Social responsibility of legal entity
Abstract: Straipsnyje nagrinėjama juridinio asmens doktrina, aptariami jos istoriniai pokyčiai ir šiuolaikinės transformacijos. Juridinio asmens institutas apima įvairias juridinio asmens rūšis, bet dėl darbo apimties nagrinėjimo dalyku pasirinkta bendrovės teisinė forma. Straipsnyje siekiama atskleisti, kad tradicinė juridinio asmens doktrina nėra pakankama metodologinė priemonė šiuolaikiniam teisiniam reguliavimui. Tuo tikslu keliami šie uždaviniai: atskleisti doktrinos priklausomybę nuo apyvartos poreikių, pristatyti šiuolaikinę juridinio asmens koncepciją, ir palyginti ją su Lietuvos teisės doktrinoje galiojančia juridinio asmens samprata
This article approaches an issue of inadequacy of traditional legal entity doctrine in solving contemporary creditor protection problems. Undoubtedly, historically the idea of per-sonhood of legal entity aimed to justify the priority of economic interest against equity requirements. However today such an approach is no longer constructive as it fails to comply with changed social circumstances where the necessity of the protection of third parties from the negligent behaviour of legal entity is evident. The doctrine of legal entity traditionally pertained on social needs. Seeking to disclose the dependence of legal entity doctrine on the historical circumstances, in the article four key transformations of legal entity that required reviewing the legal entity doctrine are discussed. Three basic theories - the agregate theory, artificial person, and real entity that have been significant in the development of the doctrine of legal person are introduced. The article reveals the main reasons why in seeking to solve the problem of risk transfer from legal entity founders to creditors efficiently today it is not enough to review only the traditional doctrine. First of all, contemporary objectives of legal regulation are tremendously different - historically legal entity theories were constructed to substantiate the independence of legal persons from their founders; today this complete independence of legal entity from the shareholders became vicious and should not be fully sustained. [...]
Internet: http://www.mruni.eu/lt/mokslo_darbai/jurisprudencija/archyvas/dwn.php?id=266075
http://www.mruni.eu/lt/mokslo_darbai/jurisprudencija/archyvas/dwn.php?id=266075
Affiliation(s): Mykolo Romerio universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml8.88 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats

Page view(s)

148
checked on May 31, 2020

Download(s)

14
checked on May 31, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.