Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/109010
Type of publication: Monografija / Monograph (K1a)
Field of Science: Istorija ir archeologija / History and archaeology (H005)
Author(s): Skrupskelis, Kęstutis
Title: Emancipating Lithuania: the early years of president Grinius : monograph
Extent: 360 p
Publishing data: Kaunas : Vytautas Magnus University
Date: 2020
Note: Recenzuota: prof. habil. dr. Egidijus Aleksandravičius; prof. dr. Šarūnas Liekis
Keywords: Kazys Grinius;Lietuvos prezidentas;Pogrindžio aktyvistas;Kazys Grinius;President of Lithuania;Underground activist
ISBN: 9786094674532
9786094674457
Abstract: Small nations fare poorly in canonical history. This should not surprise us. After all, small nations are small, that is, lacking resources to develop their own voices and have them heard. Established and generally accepted history is the work of historians of the major powers, reflecting their interests and limitations. A recent example concerns the collapse of the Soviet Union: as far as British Sovietologist Archie Brown is concerned, the important actors were leaders of the great powers. Their motives and actions are important, while unarmed Lithuanian crowds staring down Soviet tanks are forgotten.1 Yet, had it not been for small Latvians, Estonians, Georgians, Lithuanians, the Soviet Union could well have survived. Had nothing changed in those small countries, neither Soviet nor American leaders would have had to consider appropriate responses. My intent and hope, is to allow Lithuania to speak for herself, as the hundredth anniversary of February 16, 1918, the declaration of independence, is upon us. As things stand, the scattered references to her in general histories are by authors who know nearly nothing about her.2 At times, these assertions are merely false, but some are prejudicial and even laughable. In the absence of familiarity, details, there is a tendency to fall back on stereotypes, to do deductive history, ending up in many cases with falsehoods. Developments in these small nations have the misfortune of being categorized as nationalism, while nationalism is often attacked as the cause of wars, conflicts, chauvinism, narrow-mindedness, persecution of minorities. Critics urge that it is much better to celebrate diversity, to use the current American idiom, than to wallow in the petty conceits of one’s tribe. But the emancipators of Lithuania—I suspect of many other nations as well—believed that the rise of small nations was not a barrier to diversity but a condition of it.[...]
Internet: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/109010/1/ISBN9786094674457.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/109010
https://doi.org/10.7220/9786094674457
Affiliation(s): Humanitarinių mokslų fakultetas
Istorijos katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:1. Monografijos, studijos / Monographs, studies
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
ISBN9786094674457.pdf1.93 MBAdobe PDF   Until 2024-12-23View/Open

marc.xml6.36 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.