Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/101533
Type of publication: Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science ar/ir Scopus / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or / and Scopus (S1)
Field of Science: Agronomija / Agronomy (A001);Aplinkos inžinerija / Environmental engineering (T004)
Author(s): Bielski, Stanisław;Romaneckas, Kęstutis;Novikova, Anastasija;Šarauskis, Egidijus
Title: Are higher input levels to triticale growing technologies effective in biofuel production system?
Is part of: Sustainability. Basel : MDPI AG, 2019, vol. 11, iss. 21
Extent: p. 1-15
Date: 2019
Note: Article Number: 5915
Keywords: Triticale;Energy effectiveness;Production technology;Bioethanol
Abstract: Energy use in agricultural production has been increasing faster than in many other sectors of the world economy. Owing to high energy consumption during the production of agricultural inputs, with mineral nitrogen fertilizers in particular, it is often questioned as to whether agricultural production is still energy efficient. The objective of this research was to evaluate the energy efficiency of different intensity systems for the production of semi-dwarf winter triticale cultivar ”Twingo”. Cultivar “Twingo” entered the Polish National List in 2012 as one of the best yielding. For this reason, it was used in this experiment to examine its response to basic agrotechnical factors. The field experiment was conducted in the Agricultural Experiment Station in Tomaszkowo in 2013–2015. Low-input, medium-input and high-input production systems were evaluated. The compared systems differed in nitrogen fertilization rates and the level of fungicide protection. The highest output/input ratio was noticed growing winter triticale in low-input production system. The most energy-consuming operation during winter triticale production in the compared systems was mineral fertilization. The high-input production system was significantly lower energy efficiency than the other systems (6.21, medium-input 5.95, low-input 8.19). The energy return on investment (EROI) ratio was low, but above 1, in all the analyzed technologies (low-input 1.30, medium-input 1.14, high-input 1.15). The energy value of the bioethanol produced was higher than the energy inputs into the production of raw material and its processing. The conversion of winter triticale grain to bioethanol proved that the EROI reached the most favorable value for the low-input production system
Internet: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5915
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5915
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215915
Affiliation(s): Agroekosistemų ir dirvožemio mokslų institutas
Agronomijos fakultetas
Bioekonomikos plėtros fakultetas
Bioekonomikos tyrimų institutas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Žemės ūkio akademija
Žemės ūkio inžinerijos fakultetas
Žemės ūkio inžinerijos ir saugos institutas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml7.63 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Jan 5, 2020

Download(s)

4
checked on Jan 5, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.